Improvisation, Adaptability, and Collaboration: Using AUMI in Community Music Therapy
Adaptive Use Musical Instrument (AUMI) is a digital instrument that facilitates independent music making for people with diverse ranges of mobility. Employing the camera tracking capabilities available on most digital devices, users with even very little voluntary mobility are able to create and perform music by controlling a visual cursor within adaptable parameters to trigger sounds. Instead of requiring players to conform to an instrument, AUMI’s flexibility enables it to adapt to divergent artistic impulses and individual bodies. Building on previous studies that examined AUMI in an educational setting (Oliveros et al. 2011) this article presents three case studies that explore AUMI’s use in a community music therapy context. In addition to assessing the instrument’s effectiveness in achieving specific music therapy goals, ethnographic research methods illuminated various socio-cultural implications of integrating digital instruments into a music therapy setting that challenge conventional notions of youth culture, independence, and collaboration. We conclude with a discussion of the notions of adaptability and universal design as they apply not only to AUMI’s functionality in the music therapy sessions, but also in view of the instrument's ongoing development.
Aigen, K. (1995). Cognitive and affective processes in music therapy with individuals with developmental delays: A preliminary model for contemporary Nordoff-Robbins practice. Music Therapy, 13(1), 13–46. doi: 10.1093/mt/13.1.13
Blacking, J. (Ed.). (1977). The anthropology of the body. London: Academic Press.
Blacking, J. (1983). The concept of identity and folk concepts of self: A Venda case study. In A. Jacobson-Aidding (Ed.), Identity: Personal and socio-cultural, (pp. 47–65). Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
Brake, M. (1985). Comparative youth culture: The sociology of youth culture and youth subcultures in America, Britain and Canada. New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203408940
Brown, S. E. (2002). What is disability culture? Disability Studies Quarterly, 22(2), 34–50. doi: 10.18061/dsq.v22i2.343
Curtis, S., & Vaillancourt, G. (2012). The children’s right to music project. Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy, 12(3). doi: 10.15845/voices.v12i3.676
Danesi, M. (2003). Forever young: The 'teen-aging' of modern culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. doi: 10.3138/9781442675001
DeNora, T. (2000). Music in everyday life. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511489433
Frith, S. (1996). Performing rites: On the value of popular music. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: The meaning of style. London: Routledge.
Hennion, A. (2007). Those things that hold us together: Taste and sociology. Cultural Sociology,1(1), 97–114. doi: 10.1177/1749975507073923
Huq, R. (2006). Beyond subculture: Pop, youth and identity in a postcolonial world. New York: Routledge.
Knox, R., Lamont, A., Chau, T., Hamdani, Y., Schwellnus, H., Eaton, C., Tam, C., and Johnson, P. (2005). Movement-to-music: Designing and implementing a virtual music instrument for young people with physical fisabilities. International Journal of Community Music, B(1). Retrieved from http://www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/Archive/IJCM/Volume%20B/06%20Knox%20et%20al.pdf
Koen, B. D., Barz, G., & Brummel Smith, K. (2008). Introduction: Confluence of consciousness in music, medicine, and culture. In B. D. Koen (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of medical ethnomusicology (pp. 3–17). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lem, A., & Paine, G. (2011). Dynamic sonification as a free music improvisation tool for physically disabled adults. Music and Medicine, 3(3), 182–188. doi: 10.1177/1943862111401032
LeMessurier Quinn, S. (2002). Finding balance in the music therapy relationship: Exploring the therapist's musical identity. (Unpublished masters thesis). Wilfred Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Lubet, A. (2004). Tunes of impairment: An ethnomusicology of disability. Review of Disability Studies 1(1), 133–155.
Magee, W. L., & Burland, K. (2008). An exploratory study of the use of electronic music technologies in clinical music therapy. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 17(2), 124–141. doi: 10.1080/08098130809478204
Misje, R. (2013). Music technology in music therapy: A study of the possibilities, potential, and problems around the use of music technologies in music therapy with youths and adolescents. (Unpublished masters thesis). The Grieg Academy – Institute of Music, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Oliveros, P., Miller, L., Heyen, J., Siddall, G., Hazard, S. (2011). A musical improvisation interface for people with severe physical disabilities. Music and Medicine 3(3), 172–181. doi: 10.1177/1943862111411924
Pavlicevic, M., & Ansdell, G. (Eds.). (2004). Community music therapy. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Perry, K. (2010). Firework. Teenage Dream. Capital Records. CD.
Ruud, E. (1998). Music therapy: Improvisation, communication and culture. Gilsum, NH: Barcelona Publishers.
Ruud, E. (1980). Hva er musikkterapi? [What is music therapy?] Oslo: Gyldendal.
Sager, R. (2006). Creating a musical space for experiencing the other-self within. In S. A. Reily (Ed.), The musical human: Rethinking John Blacking's ethnomusicology in the twenty-first century (pp. 143–170). Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.
Sawyer, K. (2007). Improvisation and teaching. Critical Studies in Improvisation/ Études critiques en improvisation 3 (2). doi: 10.21083/csieci.v3i2.380
Slater, J. (2012). Youth for sale: Using critical disability perspectives to examine the embodiment of 'youth'. Societies, 2,195–209. doi: 10.3390/soc2030195
Stige, B. (2002). The relentless roots of community music therapy. Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy, 2(3). doi: 10.15845/voices.v2i3.98
Stige, B., & Aarø, L. E. (2012). Invitation to community music therapy. New York: Routledge.
Story, M. F. (1998). Maximizing usability: The principles of universal design. Assistive Technology: The Official Journal of RESNA,10(1), 4–12. doi: 10.1080/10400435.1998.10131955
Tucker, S., Oliveros, P., Rolnick, N., Sun Kim, C. Tomaz, C. Whalen, D., Miller, L., Heyen, J. (2016). Stretched boundaries: Improvising across abilities. In G. Siddall & E. Waterman (Eds.), Negotiated moments: Improvisation, sound, and subjectivity (pp. 181–200). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9780822374497-011
United Nations. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (1990a). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (CRPD). Retrieved from http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/disabilities-convention.htm
United Nations. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (1990b). Convention on the rights of the child (CRC). Retrieved from http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/crc.htm
Waterman, E. (2016). Improvisation and the audibility of difference: Safa, Canadian multiculturalism, and the politics of recognition. In G. Siddall & E. Waterman (Eds.), Negotiated moments: Improvisation, sound, and subjectivity (pp. 283–306). Durham: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9780822374497-017
Williams, C., & Sonderkamp, M. (2012). Where you end and I begin: Cognition and continuity in experimental improvised music and dance. Critical Studies in Improvisation/ Études critiques en improvisation, 8(2). Retrieved from http://www.criticalimprov.com/article/view/2144/2945
- There are currently no refbacks.